Congress Outlawed Surprise Medical Bills. Every Time It Wrote “Ambulance,” It Wrote “Air.”
Last updated: July 16, 2026
The Hospital Bill Was Handled. Then a Second Envelope Came.
Something happened. Someone called 911. You woke up in an emergency room, and weeks later the hospital bill arrived and it was, more or less, what you expected. Your insurance had done its job. Then a second envelope came from a name you did not recognize — a fire district, a county EMS authority, a company you have never heard of — and it wanted hundreds or thousands of dollars more for the twelve minutes you spent in the back of a truck.[32, 40]
Almost everyone who opens that envelope reaches for the same thought: this must be a mistake, there is a law against this now. There is a law. It is called the No Surprises Act, it has worked since 2022, and it is one of the more effective consumer protections Congress has passed in a generation. It just does not reach the truck.[28, 2]
This article is about why that bill is legal, and what actually decides its size. Our guide to the No Surprises Act explains how the federal shield works and ends with the standard advice: check your state. That advice is only half an answer, and this article is the other half. Your state is one of three things that decide what you pay — and it is not the one that decides most often.[38]
Smart Investing Tips
Diversify across asset classes, keep costs low, and stay invested through market cycles. Time in the market typically beats timing the market — disciplined contributions compound over decades.
One Law Binds the Emergency Room. Another Binds the Helicopter. Nothing Binds the Truck.
You do not need a lawyer to see this. You need to read four section headings. The No Surprises Act bans balance billing in two places and for one kind of transport, and each of those is a separate piece of the federal code with its own title.[2, 3, 4, 5]
The first is 42 U.S.C. §300gg-131, titled “Balance billing in cases of emergency services.” Read who it binds: “the emergency department of a hospital or independent freestanding emergency department” and the providers working there. That is a place. The word “ambulance” does not appear in it even once. The second, §300gg-132, covers non-emergency care delivered by an out-of-network provider inside a participating facility — again, a place, and again, no ambulance.[2, 3]
Transport got exactly one provision, and here is its title, word for word: “Ending surprise air ambulance bills.” That is 42 U.S.C. §300gg-112, and it defines what it protects as “medical transport by helicopter or airplane for patients.” Its companion, §300gg-135, is titled simply “Air ambulance services.” Congress named the section after the thing it was fixing, and the word doing all the work is air.[4, 5]
So the shield covers a place and it covers an aircraft. The ordinary ambulance is neither. It falls through the space between the two, and it has been falling through it since the law took effect on January 1, 2022. Notice what is not in any of this: there is no sentence anywhere that says ground ambulances are excluded. Congress never wrote an exception. It simply never wrote them in.[4, 28]
Three Locks, and a Rulebook That Has Never Heard of a Ground Ambulance
The gap is not one hole. It is three separate locks, and each one would keep the truck out on its own. Lock one: the regulation that defines “emergency services” ties the term to the EMTALA screening exam — the examination that is “within the capability of the emergency department of a hospital.” A ride is not within the capability of an emergency department. The word “ambulance” does not appear in that regulation at all.[10, 6, 1]
Lock two: the protection for out-of-network providers only attaches inside a “health care facility,” and the rules define that as a closed list of exactly four things — a hospital, a hospital outpatient department, a critical access hospital, and an ambulatory surgical center. No vehicles. Lock three: the definitions section defines two kinds of ambulance — “Air ambulance service” and “Provider of air ambulance services” — and no kind of ground ambulance at all.[9, 11]
If that still sounds like an interpretation, here is the plainest evidence there is. Open the current federal regulations for surprise billing — 45 CFR Part 149 — and the government stamps the top of the page with the date it was last updated: July 14, 2026. That part contains ninety-five sections. The number that mention ground ambulances is zero. All three ambulance sections in it are air: one on preventing surprise air ambulance bills, one on balance billing for air ambulance, one on dispute resolution for air ambulance. There is a section for emergency services, a section for facilities, a section for air. There is no section for the truck.[8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
And here is the part that should bother you. The federal government knows exactly what a ground ambulance is. It just keeps that knowledge in a different book. Medicare’s own rules define a “Ground ambulance organization,” and every service level in them — basic life support, advanced life support, specialty care transport — is spelled out as transportation “by ground ambulance vehicle.” Medicare defines the truck, prices the truck, and flatly forbids the truck from billing you extra. The surprise-billing rulebook, written by the same government, has never heard of it.[19, 20, 8]
“Check Your State” Is Half an Answer. Here Is the Other Half.
Because Congress has not acted, states have. As of February 2026, 22 states give residents some protection from surprise ground-ambulance bills: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia. Five of those arrived in 2025 alone. So the standard advice — look up your state — sounds like it should settle the question.[37, 38]
It does not, and the reason is a single sentence you have to hold in your head: a state insurance law regulates insurers. That is what it is. It is an instruction to a company that sells insurance policies in that state, telling it what it must pay an ambulance and what it may let you be charged. It is not an instruction to the ambulance, and it is not a general law of the road. It reaches your bill only by reaching whoever is holding the risk on your coverage.[7, 37]
And here is where it breaks. If your employer buys an insurance policy, there is an insurer for the state to regulate, and the law works. But if your employer pays the claims itself out of company money and merely hires an insurance company to process the paperwork — a self-funded plan — there is no insurer in the picture. The card in your wallet may say Aetna or Cigna or Blue Cross. The money is your employer’s. And a federal law from 1974 says the state may not treat that arrangement as insurance.[7, 36]
The 1974 Law That Quietly Decides Whether Your State Law Applies to You
ERISA preemption, the savings clause, and the deemer clause
The law is ERISA, and the machinery is three clauses that undo each other in sequence. First, ERISA says federal law shall “supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan.” That would wipe out state regulation of health benefits entirely — so the second clause, the savings clause, hands it back: nothing in ERISA exempts anyone from “any law of any State which regulates insurance.” Your state ambulance law is exactly that kind of law. So far, so good.[7]
Then comes the third clause, and it is the one nobody mentions. The deemer clause says that an employee benefit plan “shall not be deemed to be an insurance company or other insurer … or to be engaged in the business of insurance.” Read that against the savings clause and the trap snaps shut. Your state kept the power to regulate insurance. Your employer’s self-funded plan is, by federal command, not insurance. So the power your state kept is a power it cannot use on you.[7]
This is not a rare edge case. It is the majority. In the 2025 employer health benefits survey, 67 percent of covered workers were in self-funded plans — 80 percent at firms with 200 or more workers. Small firms look safer at 27 percent, but that number understates it: another 37 percent of covered workers at those firms are in “level-funded” plans, which are self-funded underneath and preempted the same way. So in the very states that passed a law, most working people are standing outside it, holding a card with an insurance company’s logo on it.[36, 38, 39]
Two states have tried to build a door in this wall. Oregon in 2025 and Washington in 2024 wrote opt-in provisions letting a self-funded plan volunteer to follow the state’s ambulance rules. Oregon’s is one of the first written specifically for ground ambulance. But opt-in means exactly what it says: your employer has to choose it, and most do not. It is worth one email to your benefits department to ask.[38]
The Cruel Joke: Medicare Patients Are Fully Protected. Good Job Insurance Is Not.
Now put the pieces together and look at who is actually exposed, because the answer is the opposite of what everyone assumes. If you are on Medicare, an ambulance cannot balance bill you. Not “usually.” Not “if your state says so.” The regulation is flat: an ambulance supplier “must accept the Medicare allowed charge as payment in full and may not bill or collect from the beneficiary any amount other than the unmet Part B deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts.”[20]
Medicaid is protected too. So the least protected person in this whole system is not the one with no insurance and not the one on a government program. It is the working adult with employer coverage — the coverage people call good. The federal law skips the truck. The state law skips the plan. Both of those doors close on the same person, and they close because of a word in a 2020 statute and a clause in a 1974 one, neither of which had anything to do with how sick you were that night.[20, 7, 36]
One caveat worth stating plainly, because it is where people get tripped up. Medicare’s protection is not a promise that the ride is free — you still owe the Part B deductible and the standard 20 percent coinsurance, which our Medicare guide walks through. And the protection only applies to a ride Medicare covers in the first place. That qualifier is doing real work, and the next sections explain what it means.[20, 18]
Smart Investing Tips
Diversify across asset classes, keep costs low, and stay invested through market cycles. Time in the market typically beats timing the market — disciplined contributions compound over decades.
What an Ambulance Ride Actually Costs, and Why the Bill Has Three Lines
An ambulance bill is not one price. It is built from three parts, and once you see them the number stops looking random. There is a base rate for showing up and treating you, a mileage charge for the distance, and sometimes line items for supplies. The base rate is not one number either — it steps up by how much medicine happened in the back of the truck.[20, 19]
Medicare puts exact weights on those steps, and they are worth knowing because commercial prices tend to be built on the same skeleton. Treat plain basic life support as the baseline of 1.00. An emergency basic ride is 1.60. Advanced life support is 1.20, and an emergency advanced ride 1.90. The heaviest tiers are advanced life support level 2 at 2.75 and specialty care transport at 3.25. Same distance, same night — nearly three times the base, decided by which interventions the crew performed.[20, 19]
The mileage line has one detail worth carrying with you: you are charged for loaded miles only — defined as “the number of miles the Medicare beneficiary is transported in the ambulance vehicle.” The trip the ambulance made to reach you is not billable mileage. If your bill shows miles that look longer than the trip from your door to the hospital door, that is a question worth asking in writing.[19, 20]
As for the real-world number, be careful with the figures that circulate. The most solid recent measurement comes from a study of 8.5 million ground trips: the average price rose from $820 in 2012 to $1,093 in 2021, about 33 percent. What patients actually paid out of pocket rose faster — from $140 to $229, about 64 percent. Note that $1,093 is the allowed amount, the negotiated price, not the sticker charge. The number on an out-of-network bill can be well above it.[40]
Who Owns the Ambulance Decides the Price — Even Though You Never Chose It
Most people picture an ambulance as part of the hospital. It usually is not. In the most-cited breakdown of emergency ground rides, 62 percent came from government: 37 percent from fire departments and 25 percent from other government agencies. Another 30 percent came from private, non-hospital companies. Only 8 percent were run by hospitals. The vehicle that picks you up is, more often than not, a municipal service or a private business — and you had no say in which one arrived.[35]
That ownership matters, and it is worth being precise about how it matters, because this is where a lot of writing on the subject goes wrong. Ownership does not usually decide whether your state’s law reaches the bill — most of the 22 state laws apply to public and private services alike, with only narrow exceptions such as Colorado covering private ambulances only, Delaware excluding volunteer fire departments, and Maryland treating public services differently depending on assignment of benefits. What ownership decides is the price.[37, 33]
Researchers who built a dataset identifying who owns each ambulance organization found the pattern clearly: private-sector ground ambulance transport carries substantially higher allowed amounts, higher patient cost sharing, and bigger potential surprise bills than public-sector transport — and organizations owned by private equity or publicly traded firms sit higher still. The same emergency, the same street, a different owner, a different bill.[33]
Why Ambulances Barely Join Networks — and Why the Federal Fix Would Not Fit Them
Networks work because a provider wants your business. A dermatologist joins a network to be findable in a directory. An ambulance has no such incentive, because nobody shops for one. When you dial 911, whichever service covers that address is dispatched. Its patient volume does not change one bit whether it signs a contract with your insurer or not. That is the whole economics of it, and it explains the numbers.[22]
How many rides end up out-of-network? Be suspicious of any article that gives you one confident number, because the honest answer is a range. Depending on the data set and what is being counted, studies have found roughly 28 percent, 51 percent of emergency rides (with 39 percent of non-emergency ones), and as high as 71 percent. The most recent measurement, covering 2021, puts it at 35 percent — down from 43 percent in 2012. What every one of those studies agrees on is that this is normal, not rare.[35, 33, 32, 40]
This is also why you cannot simply staple ground ambulances onto the existing law, and the federal advisory committee that studied the problem said so in its very first recommendation: Congress “should not add ground ambulance emergency medical services into the current No Surprises Act without substantial modifications.” The machinery does not fit. The Act settles payment using a benchmark built from the median in-network rate — but the committee found that as many as 85 percent of emergency ground claims are out-of-network, so there is barely an in-network median to compute. And its arbitration process assumes a provider big enough to litigate: about 75 percent of these services bill fewer than three transports a day.[22]
Medicare Protects You Completely — On Two Conditions Nobody Tells You About
The mandatory-assignment rule is powerful, but it only protects a ride that Medicare covers, and coverage has two gates. The first is medical necessity, and the regulation words it in a way worth reading twice: Medicare covers the ambulance only if you are someone “whose medical condition is such that other means of transportation are contraindicated.” Not “inconvenient.” Not “you had no car.” Contraindicated — meaning a different ride would have hurt you.[18]
The second gate is where people are genuinely caught off guard. Medicare pays for a trip to the nearest facility that can actually treat you — the regulation says the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, rural emergency hospital, or skilled nursing facility “that is capable of furnishing the required level and type of care.” Read that carefully. It is not the nearest hospital, it is the nearest capable one, which is why a crew may drive past a closer building to reach a trauma center or a hospital with the right specialist.[18]
The flip side is the one that costs money: if you insisted on being driven to a hospital farther away than the nearest capable one — because your doctor is there, because your records are there, because it is the one you trust — Medicare’s payment is limited to what the closer trip would have cost, and the extra can land on you. That limit is not in the payment regulation; it lives in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual. It is a rule people meet only after the fact.[26, 18]
One more thing worth knowing if you are arranging a scheduled ride rather than a 911 call: non-emergency ambulance transport generally needs a physician certification. For repeating trips — dialysis, for example — the certification must be dated no earlier than 60 days before the service. For an unscheduled trip where you are under a physician’s care at a facility, the certification can follow within 48 hours. If nobody signs it, the ride is not covered, and an uncovered ride is one you can be billed for in full.[18]
If You Have Medicaid, or No Insurance at All
Medicaid enrollees sit on the protected side of this line along with Medicare. A provider that takes Medicaid takes its payment as payment in full; the balance-billing problem this whole article describes is fundamentally a problem of private coverage. If you are on Medicaid and an ambulance bills you for a balance, that is a complaint worth making, not a bill worth paying quietly.[27]
If you have no insurance, there is no network to be outside of, and no insurer to argue about a rate — you face the full sticker charge, which is exactly the number that sits far above any negotiated price. There is one thing not to count on here. The No Surprises Act created a right to an advance price estimate for uninsured and self-pay patients, but that rule names air ambulance providers and says nothing about ground ones. And an advance estimate is designed for care you schedule. Nobody schedules a 911 call. Whatever the legal argument, an estimate is not a tool that can help you in an emergency.[17]
What actually helps an uninsured patient is not a legal right but a phone call. Almost every ambulance service — municipal or private — has some form of hardship or charity policy, an uninsured discount, or a payment plan, and almost none of them advertise it. Ask for the financial hardship application in writing before you agree to anything, and ask what the service would have accepted from Medicare for the same trip. That second number is a fair anchor, and it is usually a fraction of the sticker.[20, 25]
Smart Investing Tips
Diversify across asset classes, keep costs low, and stay invested through market cycles. Time in the market typically beats timing the market — disciplined contributions compound over decades.
The Bill for the Ride You Did Not Take
Here is a scenario that surprises people every time. The ambulance comes. The crew checks you over, gives you sugar or oxygen or simply decides you are fine, and you do not go to the hospital. Weeks later, a bill arrives. How is that possible when you never rode anywhere? It is possible precisely because the whole payment system is built on the word transport.[20, 23]
Medicare pays for transportation. Not for the paramedic, not for the assessment, not for the glucose — for the ride. There was a federal experiment to change that: the Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport model paid ambulance crews for treating you in place or taking you somewhere other than an emergency room. It ended on December 31, 2023, two years ahead of schedule, because too few services joined. When it died, so did the payment path for treating you at your kitchen table.[23, 24]
So the crew treats you, no transport happens, no covered service exists on paper — and some services respond by billing you directly for a response or treatment fee. Whether that charge is legitimate depends on your state, your local ordinance, and your contract with nobody at all. The federal advisory committee saw this squarely, and its adopted recommendation would require plans to cover ground ambulance services “including emergency interfacility transports and such services when an ambulance has responded, but no transport has occurred.” That is a recommendation. It is not law.[22]
The Transfer You Never Agreed To: Hospital to Hospital
There is a second kind of ambulance ride, and it produces some of the ugliest bills of all: the interfacility transfer. You are already in a hospital. That hospital cannot do what you need — no cardiac catheterization lab, no neurosurgeon, no burn unit — so a doctor orders you moved to one that can. An ambulance takes you across town. You were unconscious, or you were simply a patient being told what happens next. You did not call it, you did not choose it, and you certainly did not check whether it was in your network.[22]
The federal advisory committee wrote a definition for this exact situation: an emergency interfacility transport is the transport of a patient with an emergency medical condition “from one healthcare facility to another location or facility to receive services not available at the originating facility, as ordered by a licensed treating healthcare provider.” Read the end of that sentence again. As ordered by — this ride happens on a doctor’s instruction. The one person in the room with no decision to make is the patient. And the bill still goes to the patient.[22]
Where you live matters here more than almost anywhere else in this article. Of the 22 states with ground-ambulance protections, only 13 extend them to non-emergency transport, with Illinois joining that group on January 1, 2027. And at the federal level this ground is bare: the advisory committee’s recommendations on non-emergency services failed to pass its own vote. In its words, “no recommendations on non-emergency ground ambulance services were finalized for this report.” Even the body created to fix this could not agree on this piece of it.[37, 22]
The One Common Case Where a Different Insurer Pays: A Car Crash
If the ambulance came because of a car crash, stop before you send that bill to your health plan. In much of the country your auto policy pays first for medical costs from a crash, through medical payments coverage or, in no-fault states, personal injury protection. Those coverages generally pay from the first dollar — no deductible, no network, and no argument about whether the ambulance signed a contract, because auto coverage does not have networks.[27]
The rules here vary sharply by state — which coverage is mandatory, which pays first, what the limits are, and whether you can even opt out. Our car accident insurance claim guide covers that ground in detail, so we will not repeat it. The point to carry into the emergency room is narrow and useful: if a vehicle was involved, say so, and give them the auto claim number. The billing office will route it, and a route that never touches your health plan is a route with no network and no balance to bill.[27]
The broader lesson is the one worth budgeting around. An ambulance bill is the kind of expense that arrives with no warning, has no ceiling you can look up in advance, and does not care what month it is. That is the exact shape of expense a cash cushion exists for, and it is why the first dollars of an emergency fund do more work than any later dollar you save.[40]
The Bill Arrived. Do These Things Before You Pay a Dollar.
Do not pay it, and do not ignore it. Those are the two ways this goes badly. Instead, spend one hour collecting three documents, because every argument you might make later depends on having them: the itemized bill from the ambulance service, the explanation of benefits from your health plan, and the run report (also called the patient care report) the crew wrote that night.[28]
Then read them against each other, because the three lines of the bill are exactly where errors live. Check the level of service: were you billed for advanced life support when the run report shows the crew took your blood pressure and drove? That single distinction can be the difference between the 1.60 tier and the 2.75 tier. Check the mileage against the actual road distance from pickup to hospital, remembering that only loaded miles count. Check for services you can prove did not happen.[20, 19]
And check one thing that is easy to miss: whether your plan processed the claim at all. A surprising share of ambulance bills that land on a patient were never properly submitted, were coded in a way the plan rejected, or were denied for a technical reason that has an easy fix. If the explanation of benefits shows a denial, that is a different fight from a balance bill, and it is a fight with rules and deadlines on your side — our guide to appealing a denied claim covers how that process works.[28]
Who to Argue With, in the Order That Works
Start by finding out what kind of plan you have, because it decides which door is even open. Call the number on your card and ask one question: “Is my plan fully insured or self-funded?” They will tell you. If the answer is fully insured, your state insurance department regulates it and your state ambulance law, if you have one, applies. If the answer is self-funded, the state door is closed and your regulator is the U.S. Department of Labor instead.[7, 29]
Then work the ladder in order. Ask the ambulance service in writing for an itemized bill and a review of the service level billed. Ask your plan to reprocess the claim, and if the ride was an emergency, ask it to apply your in-network cost sharing on the ground that you had no ability to choose the provider. If your plan is fully insured and your state has a law, file with the state insurance department and name the statute. Every one of these steps costs a stamp and takes minutes, and each one creates a record.[28, 29]
And here is the step almost nobody thinks of, which follows directly from the fact that 62 percent of these services are run by government. If a fire district or a county EMS agency sent that bill, you are not arguing with a company. You are arguing with a local government, and its rates were set in a public meeting, by an ordinance, by people who stand for election. There is very often a hardship waiver written into that ordinance. Call the city or county clerk and ask for the fee schedule and the waiver policy. It is a strange sentence to write in a personal finance article, but for a great many ambulance bills, the right regulator is the city council.[35]
Smart Investing Tips
Diversify across asset classes, keep costs low, and stay invested through market cycles. Time in the market typically beats timing the market — disciplined contributions compound over decades.
The Deadline That Matters Is the One Before Collections
Every argument in the last two sections gets harder the moment the bill stops being a bill and becomes debt. Once it is sold to a collection agency, you are no longer talking to the people who wrote the charge, you are talking to a company that bought it, and the person who could have applied a hardship waiver is no longer on the phone. That handoff is the deadline that actually matters, and it is usually somewhere between 90 and 180 days.[28]
So do the unglamorous thing early: while you are disputing, ask for a zero-interest payment plan in writing and start paying something small on it. Ambulance services, especially municipal ones, hand these out readily, and an account in an active payment plan is an account that does not get sold. What happens after it is sold — your rights against collectors, and what does and does not go on your credit report — is a separate subject that our guide to medical bills and medical debt handles in full.[28]
If it has already turned into a balance you are carrying — on a card, or as one more line in a stack of payments — then the question stops being medical and starts being arithmetic: which debt to attack first, and what the order costs you. That is a solvable problem, and the order you choose genuinely changes the total.[40]
Washington Has Known About This for Five Years. Here Is Exactly Where It Stands.
The same law that left the gap also ordered someone to study it. Section 117 of the 2021 act created a federal Ground Ambulance and Patient Billing Advisory Committee and gave it deadlines — a committee within 90 days, a report within 180 days of its first meeting. The committee was chartered about eight months late, held its first meeting in May 2023, and its report carries a cover date of March 29, 2024, months past its own deadline. It was transmitted to the Secretaries on August 28, 2024.[21, 22]
What it produced is worth knowing, because it is the shape of any future fix. The committee adopted 12 recommendations. Its centerpiece would ban balance billing outright and guarantee a minimum payment; its cost-sharing rule would cap what you pay at the lesser of $100, adjusted for inflation, or 10 percent of that minimum rate — note that this is ten percent of the rate, not of the billed charge, which is a far larger number. It would require your plan to pay or deny within 30 days, with interest for lateness, and it would require coverage even when an ambulance responded and never transported you.[22]
It is just as important to know what the committee could not agree on, because those are the pieces that will not be in any first draft. Its proposals covering non-emergency transport all failed. And it voted down, 6 to 7, the idea of extending the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process to ground ambulances — reasoning that a guaranteed minimum payment should make arbitration unnecessary, and that for a service billing three transports a day the filing fees could exceed the disputed charge.[22]
And now the part that matters most, stated plainly: Congress has done nothing with any of it. As of July 2026 no bill implementing these recommendations has even been introduced, and the federal surprise-billing regulations, current as of July 14, 2026, still contain not one word about ground ambulances. Be careful here, because two bills invite exactly this mistake: the Protecting Access to Ground Ambulance Medical Services Act of 2025, in both chambers, sounds like the fix and is not — it is a Medicare payment bill, and it does not touch balance billing at all. The honest summary is the one the Commonwealth Fund used in February 2026: federal action has stalled.[8, 38, 30, 31]
The states, meanwhile, keep moving — and keep showing how hard this is. Five acted in 2025: North Dakota, Utah, New Hampshire, and Oregon passed new laws, and Illinois rebuilt its old one. Tennessee shows the other side: its bill passed the House 94 to 0 and then died in a Senate committee without a vote. And a cautionary note for anyone certain a rate law is a free win — researchers studying New York’s pioneering law, generally credited as the first of its kind, found it was associated with a 13.34 percentage-point increase in ambulance prices. Protecting patients from the bill is not the same as making the ride cheaper.[38, 41, 34]
Key Takeaways
Your ambulance bill is legal because of an absence, not a decision. The federal ban on surprise bills covers a place — the emergency department — and one kind of transport, and Congress titled that provision “Ending surprise air ambulance bills.” The regulations that carry the law out, current as of July 14, 2026, define air ambulances twice and ground ambulances not at all. Nobody wrote an exclusion. They simply never wrote the truck in.[4, 8, 9]
“Check your state” is real advice but only half of one. Twenty-two states protect residents, and five of those laws arrived in 2025 — but a state insurance law regulates insurers, and a 1974 federal statute says a self-funded employer plan is not one. Since 67 percent of covered workers are in exactly those plans, most people in a protected state are standing outside their own state’s protection. Before anything else, call the number on your card and ask whether your plan is fully insured or self-funded. That single answer tells you which door is open.[38, 7, 36]
The protection runs backwards from what everyone assumes. On Medicare, an ambulance must accept the allowed charge as payment in full and may bill you nothing beyond the Part B deductible and coinsurance. Medicaid is protected too. The person most exposed to an ambulance balance bill in America is the working adult with employer coverage. If that is you, three things decide your bill and none of them is how sick you were: how your plan is funded, who owns the truck, and whether the ride crossed one of Medicare’s two conditions — medical necessity, and the nearest facility that could actually treat you.[20, 18, 33]
If a bill is in front of you now, the order is simple. Do not pay it and do not ignore it. Get the itemized bill, the explanation of benefits, and the crew’s run report, then check the service level and the loaded miles against what actually happened. Ask your plan to reprocess it. If a fire district or county sent it, remember that its rates were set by ordinance and its hardship waiver is a phone call to the clerk away — for most ambulance bills the right regulator really is the city council. Above all, get onto a payment plan before the account is sold, because every argument you have gets weaker the day it becomes debt. This article is general information, not legal, medical, or insurance advice; your plan documents and your state’s law govern your situation.[19, 35, 28]
Ambulance Bills: Frequently Asked Questions
Short, plain answers to what people ask most after an ambulance bill shows up in 2026. Where the answer depends on your state or your plan, we say so rather than guess.[28]
Does the No Surprises Act protect me from an ambulance bill?
+
For a helicopter or airplane, yes. For an ordinary ambulance on the road, no. The federal law bans balance billing for emergency care at a hospital emergency department, for out-of-network providers working inside an in-network facility, and for air ambulances. A ground ambulance is not a facility and is not an aircraft, so it falls between the protections. There is no sentence in the law excluding it — Congress simply never wrote it in, and the regulations that carry the law out, current as of July 14, 2026, still say nothing about ground ambulances.
My state passed an ambulance billing law. Why did I still get a bill?
+
Almost certainly because your health plan is self-funded. A state insurance law is an instruction to an insurance company. If your employer pays claims out of its own money and only hires an insurer to administer the paperwork, federal law says that plan is not an insurance company, so your state cannot regulate it — even though the card in your wallet has an insurer logo on it. About 67 percent of covered workers are in self-funded plans, and 80 percent at firms with 200 or more workers. Call the number on your card and ask whether your plan is fully insured or self-funded before you spend time on a state complaint.
How much does an ambulance ride cost?
+
There is no single price, because the bill is assembled from a base rate plus loaded mileage plus supplies, and the base rate steps up with the level of care given. In the most recent broad measurement, covering 8.5 million trips, the average price rose from about $820 in 2012 to $1,093 in 2021, while the average amount patients paid out of pocket rose from $140 to $229. But that $1,093 is a negotiated price, not a sticker charge — an out-of-network or uninsured bill can be far higher. Two identical-distance rides can differ by nearly three times in the base rate alone, depending on whether the crew provided basic or advanced life support.
The ambulance came but did not take me anywhere. Why am I being billed?
+
Because the payment system is built entirely on the word transport. Medicare pays for the ride, not for the paramedic or the assessment, so when no ride happens there is no covered service on paper. A federal experiment called the ET3 model did pay crews for treating patients in place, but it ended on December 31, 2023, two years early, for low participation. Some services respond by billing the patient directly for a response or treatment fee. Whether that charge holds up depends on your state and on your local ordinance, which is why the city or county clerk is worth calling if a public service sent it.
I am on Medicare. Can an ambulance balance bill me?
+
No. This is one of the clearest rules in the whole area. The regulation says an ambulance supplier must accept the Medicare allowed charge as payment in full and may not bill or collect from the beneficiary any amount other than the unmet Part B deductible and Part B coinsurance. Medicaid enrollees are protected as well. The catch is that this only applies to a ride Medicare actually covers, which requires that other transportation was medically contraindicated and that you were taken to the nearest facility capable of treating you. If either condition fails, the ride may not be covered at all, and an uncovered ride can be billed in full.
Should I just refuse the ambulance and take an Uber to the emergency room?
+
Please do not turn a cost article into a medical decision. An ambulance is not a taxi with a stretcher; it is the start of treatment, and for a stroke, a heart attack, a serious injury, or trouble breathing the care that begins in the vehicle and the hospital team waiting because the crew radioed ahead are the things that change outcomes. The honest framing is that the billing system is broken, not that the ride is optional. If cost is your worry, the useful moves come after the fact: check the bill line by line, ask your plan to reprocess it, and ask about a hardship waiver.
The hospital transferred me to another hospital by ambulance. Do I have to pay for that?
+
Often yes, which strikes most people as absurd given that a doctor ordered the transfer and the patient had no say in it. Interfacility transfers produce some of the worst bills in this area precisely because they combine no choice with no protection. Whether you have any recourse depends heavily on your state: only 13 of the 22 states with ambulance protections extend them to non-emergency transport, with Illinois joining on January 1, 2027. At the federal level there is nothing — the advisory committee that studied this could not pass any of its non-emergency recommendations, and said so in the report.
Are ambulance membership or subscription programs worth buying?
+
They can help, but read what you are actually buying. These programs, often sold by a fire district or a local service for a modest annual fee, typically promise to waive whatever your insurance does not pay — which is exactly the balance bill this article is about. The limits matter: a membership usually only covers rides by that one service, so it does nothing if you are picked up in the next town, on a trip, or by a different provider. If most 911 calls at your address would be answered by the service selling the membership, the math is often reasonable. Ask in writing which service areas and which vehicles it covers before you buy.
The bill says advanced life support but they only took my blood pressure. Can I dispute that?
+
Yes, and this is one of the highest-value things you can check. The level of service is not a label, it is a price tier: measured against basic life support at a weight of 1.00, an emergency basic ride is 1.60, advanced life support is 1.20, an emergency advanced ride is 1.90, and the top tiers reach 2.75 and 3.25. Request the itemized bill and the crew run report in writing, then compare what the report says was actually done against the level billed. Also check the mileage, since only loaded miles count — the distance the ambulance drove to reach you is not billable.
Is Congress going to fix this?
+
Not soon, on the current evidence. The 2021 law created a federal advisory committee to study the gap; it adopted 12 recommendations, including an outright balance-billing ban and a cap on your share at the lesser of $100 or 10 percent of a guaranteed minimum rate, and delivered them to the Secretaries on August 28, 2024. As of July 2026 no bill implementing them has been introduced, and the federal regulations still contain nothing about ground ambulances. Watch out for two bills named the Protecting Access to Ground Ambulance Medical Services Act of 2025 — despite the name, they are Medicare payment bills and do not touch balance billing. The Commonwealth Fund summed it up in February 2026: federal action has stalled.
References
- [1] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §300gg-111, “Preventing surprise medical bills” (Public Health Service Act §2799A-1). Defines “emergency services” by reference to the EMTALA screening examination that is within the capability of a hospital emergency department or independent freestanding emergency department, plus stabilizing treatment. The term “ground ambulance” does not appear in this section. (opens in new tab)
- [2] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §300gg-131, “Balance billing in cases of emergency services” (PHS Act §2799B-1, added by Pub. L. 116-260, div. BB, tit. I, §104(a)). Binds “the emergency department of a hospital or independent freestanding emergency department” and the health care providers furnishing emergency services there, for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022. The word “ambulance” does not appear in this section. (opens in new tab)
- [3] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §300gg-132, “Balance billing in cases of non-emergency services performed by nonparticipating providers at certain participating facilities” (PHS Act §2799B-2). The protection attaches to services delivered inside a participating health care facility. The word “ambulance” does not appear in this section. (opens in new tab)
- [4] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §300gg-112, titled “Ending surprise air ambulance bills” (PHS Act §2799A-2, added by Pub. L. 116-260, div. BB, tit. I, §105(a)(1)). The plan-side provision: it defines “air ambulance service” as “medical transport by helicopter or airplane for patients,” caps the enrollee’s cost sharing at the in-network level, and counts it toward the in-network deductible and out-of-pocket maximum. Ground ambulance is not mentioned anywhere in the section. (opens in new tab)
- [5] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §300gg-135, titled “Air ambulance services” (PHS Act §2799B-5, added by Pub. L. 116-260, div. BB, tit. I, §105(b), 134 Stat. 2851). The provider-side companion to §300gg-112: a nonparticipating provider of air ambulance services “shall not bill, and shall not hold liable” the patient for more than the cost-sharing amount. Ground ambulance is not mentioned. Note that §2799B-5 is §300gg-135, not §300gg-112 — the two are separate provisions added by different subsections. (opens in new tab)
- [6] United States Code, 42 U.S.C. §1395dd, “Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor” — the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), section 1867 of the Social Security Act. Requires hospitals with emergency departments to provide an appropriate medical screening examination and either stabilizing treatment or an appropriate transfer. The No Surprises Act’s definition of “emergency services” is tethered to this screening examination, which is why it reaches the emergency department rather than the ride to it. (opens in new tab)
- [7] United States Code, 29 U.S.C. §1144 — ERISA §514, the preemption section. Subsection (a) supersedes “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan.” Subsection (b)(2)(A), the savings clause, preserves “any law of any State which regulates insurance, banking, or securities.” Subsection (b)(2)(B), the deemer clause, provides that an employee benefit plan “shall not be deemed to be an insurance company or other insurer … or to be engaged in the business of insurance,” which is why a state insurance law reaches fully insured employer plans but not self-funded ones. (opens in new tab)
- [8] Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR Part 149, “Surprise Billing and Transparency Requirements” — the current federal regulations implementing the No Surprises Act. The page carries the currency banner “Displaying title 45, up to date as of 7/14/2026.” Of the ninety-five sections in this part, none mentions ground ambulances. All three ambulance sections are air: §149.130 (preventing surprise bills for air ambulance services), §149.440 (balance billing for air ambulance services), and §149.520 (independent dispute resolution for air ambulance services). This is the primary evidence that no federal ground-ambulance balance-billing rule existed as of July 2026. (opens in new tab)
- [9] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.30, the definitions section for the entire surprise-billing regulatory scheme. It defines twenty-four terms. Two of them are about aircraft — “Air ambulance service” (medical transport by a rotary wing or fixed wing air ambulance as defined in 42 CFR §414.605) and “Provider of air ambulance services.” None defines a ground ambulance. “Health care facility” is a closed four-item list: a hospital (SSA §1861(e)), a hospital outpatient department, a critical access hospital (SSA §1861(mm)(1)), and an ambulatory surgical center (SSA §1833(i)(1)(A)). No vehicle of any kind is a facility. (opens in new tab)
- [10] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.110, “Preventing surprise medical bills for emergency services” — the plan-side rule. Its definition of emergency services at paragraph (c)(2) is anchored to an EMTALA medical screening examination “within the capability of the emergency department of a hospital or of an independent freestanding emergency department,” plus stabilizing treatment within the capabilities of the staff and facilities available there. The word “ambulance” does not appear in this section, and pre-hospital transport is not within that capability set. (opens in new tab)
- [11] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.120, the plan-side rule for non-emergency services performed by nonparticipating providers at certain participating health care facilities. Because the protection attaches only inside a “health care facility” as defined at §149.30 — a closed list of four building types — it cannot attach to a vehicle. (opens in new tab)
- [12] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.130, “Preventing surprise medical bills for air ambulance services.” Requires plans and issuers to cover air ambulance services from nonparticipating providers on the same cost-sharing terms as participating ones. This is the only transport-coverage rule in the part, and it is air only. (opens in new tab)
- [13] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.410, “Balance billing in cases of emergency services” — the provider-side ban. Paragraph (a)(1) binds a nonparticipating emergency facility and (a)(2) binds a nonparticipating provider: each “must not bill, and must not hold liable” the patient beyond the plan’s cost-sharing requirement. The word “ambulance” does not appear anywhere in this section. (opens in new tab)
- [14] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.420, “Balance billing in cases of non-emergency services performed by nonparticipating providers at certain participating health care facilities” — the provider-side companion for facility-based non-emergency care, including the notice-and-consent exception and the ancillary services that can never be waived. The word “ambulance” does not appear in this section either. (opens in new tab)
- [15] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.440, “Balance billing in cases of air ambulance services.” Prohibits a nonparticipating provider of air ambulance services from billing an insured patient more than the cost-sharing amount, for coverage beginning on or after January 1, 2022. Together with §149.410 and §149.420 this completes the provider-side structure: one section for emergencies, one for participating facilities, one for aircraft. There is no ground-ambulance analogue. (opens in new tab)
- [16] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.520, “Independent dispute resolution process for air ambulance services.” Applies the federal IDR framework with air-specific factors such as vehicle type, clinical capability level, patient acuity, and population density at the point of pickup. The third and last ambulance section in Part 149, and again air only — there is no dispute-resolution path for a ground ambulance bill. (opens in new tab)
- [17] Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR §149.610, the good faith estimate requirement for uninsured and self-pay individuals. It defines a health care provider as “a physician or other health care provider who is acting within the scope of practice of that provider’s license or certification under applicable State law, including a provider of air ambulance services.” The rule names air ambulance and is silent on ground; note that “including” is illustrative rather than limiting, so this is not an express exclusion. In practice a good faith estimate is designed for scheduled items and services and cannot function for a 911 response. (opens in new tab)
- [18] Code of Federal Regulations, 42 CFR §410.40, Medicare coverage of ambulance services. Subsection (e), “Medical necessity requirements,” covers transport “only if they are furnished to a beneficiary whose medical condition is such that other means of transportation are contraindicated.” Subsection (f), “Origin and destination requirements,” pays for transport to “the nearest hospital, CAH, rural emergency hospital (REH), or SNF that is capable of furnishing the required level and type of care.” Subsection (c) lists the covered levels of service, and (e)(2)-(3) set the physician certification rules for non-emergency transport — no earlier than 60 days before a scheduled repetitive service, or within 48 hours after an unscheduled one for a facility resident under a physician’s care. (opens in new tab)
- [19] Code of Federal Regulations, 42 CFR §414.605, the definitions for the Medicare ambulance fee schedule — the proof that federal law knows exactly what a ground ambulance is. It defines “Ground ambulance organization” as “a Medicare provider or supplier of ground ambulance services,” and every service level is written as transport “by ground ambulance vehicle”: basic life support, advanced life support level 1, and specialty care transport (defined as interfacility transport of a critically injured or ill beneficiary at a level beyond the scope of the EMT-Paramedic). “Loaded mileage” means “the number of miles the Medicare beneficiary is transported in the ambulance vehicle.” (opens in new tab)
- [20] Code of Federal Regulations, 42 CFR §414.610, the Medicare ambulance fee schedule — the mandatory-assignment rule that makes Medicare enrollees the best-protected patients in this area. Paragraph (b): ambulance suppliers “must accept the Medicare allowed charge as payment in full and may not bill or collect from the beneficiary any amount other than the unmet Part B deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts.” Paragraph (c) builds payment from a conversion factor times relative value units times a geographic adjustment factor, plus mileage: BLS 1.00, BLS-emergency 1.60, ALS1 1.20, ALS1-emergency 1.90, ALS2 2.75, specialty care transport 3.25, paramedic intercept 1.75. Paragraph (c)(3): “Payment is based on loaded miles.” (opens in new tab)
- [21] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Advisory Committee on Ground Ambulance and Patient Billing (GAPB)” — the landing page for the federal committee created by Section 117 of the No Surprises Act to review options for protecting consumers from ground-ambulance balance billing. CMS states that the Committee “issued its Report to the Secretaries containing Recommendations on preventing balance billing for ground ambulance services and protecting consumers on August 28, 2024,” and lists the committee status as currently inactive. (opens in new tab)
- [22] Advisory Committee on Ground Ambulance and Patient Billing, “Report on Prevention of Out-Of-Network Ground Ambulance Emergency Service Balance Billing,” dated March 29, 2024 on its cover and transmitted to the Secretaries on August 28, 2024. Chapter 7 lists exactly twelve adopted recommendations. Recommendation 8 caps patient cost sharing at “the lesser of $100 (adjusted by the CPI-U annually) or 10% of the rate established under Recommendation 12” — ten percent of the minimum required payment rate, not of the billed charge. Recommendation 12 would ban balance billing and guarantee a minimum payment. Recommendation 3B requires coverage “including emergency interfacility transports and such services when an ambulance has responded, but no transport has occurred.” Recommendation 1 warns Congress “should not add ground ambulance emergency medical services into the current No Surprises Act without substantial modifications.” Recommendations 13, 14 and 15 were not adopted, so no recommendation on non-emergency service was finalized, and extending the No Surprises Act arbitration process to ground ambulances was voted down 6-7. Chapter 2 reports that “as many as 85 percent of ground ambulance emergency claims are out-of-network” and about 75 percent of these services bill fewer than three transports a day. (opens in new tab)
- [23] CMS Innovation Center, “Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport (ET3) Model.” The page states verbatim: “The ET3 Model ended early on December 31, 2023, two years prior to the performance period end date. This decision was made due to lower than expected participation and lower than projected interventions.” The model had tested Medicare payments for treatment in place and for transport to an alternative destination following a 911 call; with its end, Medicare returned to paying for transport only. (opens in new tab)
- [24] CMS Innovation Center, “Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport (ET3) Model — Frequently Asked Questions.” Explains the two payment pathways the model tested following a 911 call — transport to an alternative destination partner, and treatment in place delivered in person or by telehealth — and confirms that the ability to bill for ET3 interventions ran only through the December 31, 2023 end date. (opens in new tab)
- [25] CMS, “Ambulance Fee Schedule & ZIP Code Files” — the official public files for the Medicare ambulance fee schedule, including the conversion factor, the relative value units by level of service, geographic adjustment factors, and the ZIP code files that determine rural and super-rural status. This is the source for what Medicare would have paid for a given ride, which is a useful anchor when negotiating an uninsured or out-of-network ambulance bill. (opens in new tab)
- [26] CMS, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 10 — Ambulance Services (Rev. 13169, issued April 17, 2025). The operational guidance behind 42 CFR §410.40, including the nearest-appropriate-facility rule and the partial payment provision at §10.3.7, under which the contractor bases payment on the amount payable “from the pickup point to the nearest appropriate facility” when coverage limits are exceeded. This limit is in the manual, not in the payment regulation. (opens in new tab)
- [27] CMS, “Ending Surprise Medical Bills” — the federal No Surprises Act hub, covering the scope of the protections, the independent dispute resolution process, and consumer resources including the No Surprises Help Desk. Confirms that Medicare, Medicaid, Indian Health Service, Veterans Affairs and TRICARE enrollees already have separate protections and are not the target of the Act. (opens in new tab)
- [28] CMS, “Know your rights” — the consumer page detailing what the No Surprises Act protects for people who use insurance (emergency care, out-of-network providers at in-network facilities, and air ambulance) and the exceptions. CMS states here that ground ambulances are generally not covered, along with short-term, sharing-ministry, and fixed-indemnity plans. (opens in new tab)
- [29] U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), “Avoid Surprise Healthcare Expenses: How the No Surprises Act Can Protect You.” Plain-language explanation of the emergency, in-network-facility and air-ambulance protections and what the law does not cover. EBSA is also the federal regulator for self-funded employer plans, which is where a complaint goes when a state insurance department has no jurisdiction. (opens in new tab)
- [30] U.S. Congress, H.R. 2232, “Protecting Access to Ground Ambulance Medical Services Act of 2025” (Rep. Claudia Tenney, introduced March 18, 2025). Despite the title, this is a Medicare payment bill — “to amend title XVIII to protect patient access to ground ambulance services under part B of the Medicare program,” continuing the ambulance add-on payments. It does not address balance billing and implements none of the GAPB recommendations. As of July 2026 it remains introduced only. (opens in new tab)
- [31] U.S. Congress, S. 1643, “Protecting Access to Ground Ambulance Medical Services Act of 2025” (Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, introduced May 7, 2025) — the Senate companion to H.R. 2232, likewise a Medicare Part B payment bill rather than a balance-billing bill, and likewise a serial reintroduction that has not advanced. As of July 2026 no bill implementing the GAPB recommendations has been introduced in the 119th Congress. (opens in new tab)
- [32] Chhabra KR, McGuire K, Sheetz KH, Scott JW, Nuliyalu U, Ryan AM. “Most Patients Undergoing Ground And Air Ambulance Transportation Receive Sizable Out-Of-Network Bills.” Health Affairs 2020;39(5):777-782. Using claims from one large national insurer for 2013-2017, the study found that 71 percent of ground ambulance rides carried a potential surprise bill, with a median potential balance bill of $450 for ground transport and $21,698 for air, and roughly $129 million a year in out-of-network ground ambulance bills. Note that $450 is a median, not an average, and rests on 2013-2017 data. (opens in new tab)
- [33] Adler L, Ly B, Duffy E, Hannick K, Hall M, Trish E. “Ground Ambulance Billing And Prices Differ By Ownership Structure.” Health Affairs 2023;42(2):227-236. The authors built a novel data set identifying the ownership structure of ground ambulance organizations and found that private-sector transport carries substantially higher allowed amounts, higher patient cost sharing and larger potential surprise bills than public-sector transport, with private-equity-owned and publicly traded organizations higher still. Their commercially insured sample for 2014-2017 put the out-of-network share at about 28 percent. (opens in new tab)
- [34] Xu WY, Garmon C, Retchin SM, Li Y. “The impacts of New York’s balance billing regulation on ground ambulance pricing.” Health Services Research 2025;60(2):e14387. New York enacted its Emergency Medical Services and Surprise Bills Law in March 2014, and it took effect on March 15, 2015. Analyzing 2012-2019 data, the authors found the regulation was associated with a 13.34 percentage-point increase in total ground ambulance prices — a caution that protecting patients from the bill is not the same as making the underlying ride cheaper. (opens in new tab)
- [35] Amin K, Pollitz K, Claxton G, Rae M, Cox C. “Ground Ambulance Rides and Potential for Surprise Billing.” Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, June 24, 2021. Analyzing IBM MarketScan claims for large-employer enrollees, the brief found that about 51 percent of emergency and 39 percent of non-emergency ground ambulance rides included an out-of-network charge, and that roughly 3 million privately insured people are taken to an emergency room by ambulance each year. It also reports the ownership mix for emergency ground rides in 2020: 62 percent government — 37 percent fire departments and 25 percent other government organizations — plus 30 percent private non-hospital companies and 8 percent hospital-owned. Note the out-of-network figures rest on 2018 claims. (opens in new tab)
- [36] KFF, “2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey,” Section 10: Plan Funding (released October 22, 2025). Reports that “sixty-seven percent of covered workers, including 27% of covered workers at firms with 10 to 199 workers and 80% at larger firms, are enrolled in plans that are self-funded.” It also reports that 37 percent of covered workers at firms with 10 to 199 workers are in level-funded plans, which are self-funded underneath and therefore preempted the same way — meaning the share of workers beyond the reach of state insurance law is larger than the headline figure suggests. (opens in new tab)
- [37] Commonwealth Fund, “Expanding the No Surprises Act to Protect Consumers from Surprise Ambulance Bills: Map of State Laws” (Madison Harden-Stein, Georgetown Center on Health Insurance Reforms; graphic updated February 2026). The interactive tracker of state ground-ambulance billing protections, with the payment standard, scope and plan types for each state. Its underlying dataset codes 22 states as having protections, and shows most laws applying to public and private ambulance services alike, with narrow exceptions in Colorado, Delaware and Maryland. Every state entry notes that the law reaches only state-regulated plans. (opens in new tab)
- [38] Harden-Stein M, Hoadley J. “Consumers Still Face Surprise Bills for Ground Ambulances — States Are Trying to Protect Them.” Commonwealth Fund, To the Point, February 18, 2026. States verbatim that after the GAPB recommendations “federal action has stalled,” that “people in 22 states now have some protection from surprise bills for ground ambulance services,” and that federal action remains necessary because “states lack jurisdiction to regulate self-funded employer-sponsored health plans, which cover most U.S. workers.” Documents the five 2025 state actions — North Dakota, Utah, New Hampshire, Oregon and a revamped Illinois law — Texas’s sunset extension to September 1, 2027, that 13 of the 22 states also cover non-emergency transport, and the ERISA opt-in provisions adopted by Oregon in 2025 and Washington in 2024. (opens in new tab)
- [39] Kelmar P. “Emergency! The high cost of ambulance surprise bills.” U.S. PIRG Education Fund (author was a member of the GAPB Advisory Committee). Reports that state ground-ambulance laws protect only patients in state-regulated plans, so “about 60% of those with insurance are left unprotected because their employer-sponsored health plans are exempt from state laws,” that roughly one in ten insured Americans reaches the emergency room by ambulance, and that as of February 5, 2026 twenty-two states have enacted protections. PIRG’s 60 percent and KFF’s 67 percent use different denominators and should not be merged. (opens in new tab)
- [40] Hargraves J, Sarfo E. “Ambulance Trends Over 10 Years, 2012-2021.” Health Care Cost Institute, October 12, 2023. Analyzing 8.5 million ground ambulance trips for people under 65 with employer-sponsored insurance, HCCI found the average price rose from $820 in 2012 to $1,093 in 2021 (about 33 percent) while average out-of-pocket spending rose from $140 to $229 (about 64 percent), and that the out-of-network share fell to 35 percent in 2021 from 43 percent in 2012. This is the most recent of the widely cited out-of-network measurements. Note the price figures are allowed amounts, not billed charges. (opens in new tab)
- [41] Cameron S. “The Last Surprise Bill: Tennessee’s failed fight to close the ground ambulance loophole.” WSMV4, June 25, 2026. Documents Tennessee House Bill 1061, sponsored by Rep. Greg Vital, which passed the Tennessee House 94-0 and then stalled in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee before adjournment, leaving the state without ground-ambulance balance-billing protection. The reporting is anchored on a Clarksville resident left responsible for more than $4,800 after his insurer paid only a portion of the ambulance bill. (opens in new tab)
Smart Investing Tips
Diversify across asset classes, keep costs low, and stay invested through market cycles. Time in the market typically beats timing the market — disciplined contributions compound over decades.